You have the right to remain silent, anything you say may be used as discrimination against you, you have …
Hereforeto and forthwith, let it be known:
In the case of Puffery vs Miranda ’tis true; I fore-spoke not and admit forthwith to discriminate action and judgmental demeanour. I indeed concur with the party of the first part – indeed myself – in the action of the party of the second part – possibly you; or not, as the case may (or may not) be – in class of action (always classy, right?) pertaining to the alleged rights of the party of the second part to adversarially affect parties of the third part (third parties y’all) by direct (or indirect) transmission of the willful – whether by discrete determination, common ignoramdum or stupe – tripe that may (or may not) affect the sensibility of said parties of the third part (content purveyors expectant of the principles fair play, cricket and having a nice day) giving rise to the use of force majeur (being willful and determined action of the party of the first part) to mitigate potential harm or offence by the reduction of dissemination of said tripe by the party of the second part, in consideration of the sensibilities of parties of the third part.
In translation effluvium:
WadMabbit reserves the right to remove anyone and delete anything as sees fit.